News: Lawsuits, CA Democracy Act not on 2010 ballot and more
UC Printing Services Set to Close
UC to pay group’s legal fees in stadium lawsuit
California Public Employee Retirement System Pension Funds – Could they go …
Chief Executive Roundtable chair named alumni regent
No loans! Major colleges pledge aid without debt
Settlement clears way for Berkeley stadium update
California Public Employee Retirement System Pension Funds – Could they go …
UC to pay group’s legal fees in stadium lawsuit
Bump in revenues might help schools more than state budget
Protests prove costly to campus
Analysis: Recent California newspaper editorials
McCOURT v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES…
California Democracy Act Fails to Collect Enough Signatures for November Ballot
UC Berkeley, neighbors settle stadium lawsuit
How a Republican Accounting Trick Is Destroying Unions, Pensions, and Public … (blog/opinion)
UC’s Yudof wants to know more about Chamber of Commerce’s anti-Brown ad … (blog/opinion)
Pauley Pavilion: UCLA responds
UCLA has decided against using $15 million in student fees that students voted to spend on renovating two campus buildings (not Pauley Pavilion.) Read about the decision here: UCLA diverts student fees from Pauley Pavilion renovation. Read the earlier article that stated UCLA would put the $15 million here: State universities tap student fees for unintended projects.
I still have a few questions:
- Is the controversy over spending student fees on construction, period, or is the controversy over spending fees students voted to spend on construction other than renovating Pauley Pavilion?
- The later article states that how the $15 million will be used has not been decided. Why is that money not going toward the purpose voted on?
- Was it lawful for UCLA to plan on using the $15 million for a purpose other than what was voted on?
leave a comment